The basis of today’s western historiography of the Soviet Union is the enormous propaganda campaign launched by the
Khrushchev’s era was a crucial turning point for WWII history as well. The propaganda was highly intensified and enriched by more false assumptions, all aimed at showing how unprepared the
Since, Tukhachevsky was the “genius” to suggest to Stalin that the Red army needed modernization and more tanks, but he, just like many, had been purged, he was chosen to be the leading figure in this absurd campaign. This all fitted well with the main goal of Soviet propaganda, which was hiding and denial of any responsibility for World War II. The Soviets were stupid, unprepared peasants, all the smart people were purged by Stalin, and thus they became an innocent victim to the German world domination aggression. Doesn’t it sound wonderful?
The problem is that this propaganda was basically swallowed by the thirsty western historians. Once swallowed, they continued to build upon it, to publish “milestone” works and to build careers. After years of doing so, however, times changed, the
The situation is so controversial, that instead of people asking the established historians, where is their proof of all the assumptions they have based their works upon, we have people asking if we have enough archival evidence for revising the historiography! Who in his right mind would imagine possible that the entire literature published for half a century is complete non-sense? As always is, such news are difficult to swallow, since they represent the historic truth, and not the pre-constructed propaganda which the
To all of you who believe that freedom of speech and democracy is a system which would automatically protect you from propaganda, I strongly suggest: think again!
0 commenti:
Posta un commento